Final Exam Worl War II Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Final Exam Worl War II - Assignment Example Legally the British had no right to interfere with Germany’s annexation of part of Czechoslovakia. Germany and Czechoslovakia’s fight was between them. Great Britain could advise the two countries, but had no stake in the fight. Chamberlain did not have a choice but to act in the manner he did. History has made him look like a coward. This is not true. Chamberlain dealt with Germany in a logical manner. Two factors made Chamberlain negotiate with Germany instead of declaring war. The first factor was Chamberlain wanted to maintain peace on the European continent. The second factor was the lack of a treaty between Great Britain and Czechoslovakia. Great Britain and France dealt with Germany diplomatically due to these two factors. History might have been different if Germany tried to annex Poland first. Great Britain and France had a nonaggression treaty with Poland. Thus Poland and Germany’s fight was a British and French fight. History might have also been diffe rent if Czechoslovakia had made a treaty with Great Britain and France before Germany’s aggression. Basically Chamberlain acted in a responsible manner. He had no way of knowing the chaos that would ensue from encouraging Hitler. Chamberlain was a prime minister; he could not read minds or the future. If a simple lesson is to be learned from the situation between Chamberlain and Hitler, it would be do not let fear of the past shadow the future. Chamberlain was frightened by the Great War, like most of his generation. The carnage of World War I would frighten any sane person. This fear might have been more of a deciding factor than the legal aspect for Britain and France’s policies toward Germany during this time. Fear might have blinded Chamberlain into believing Hitler’s lies more easily. Fear should not have been a factor, but in Chamberlain’s defense, he was acting out of fear for his country. 2. There were